According to the statistics, our current generation of children are one of the sickest on record. Food allergies, asthma, ADHD, autism, and a laundry list of other issues are constant reminders of our persistent environmental toxicity combined with iatrogenic damage. The long-failed pharmaceutical model has sought in vain to cover up these symptoms with drugs, while an ever-increasing vaccine schedule has turned the children of this generation into an ATM machine for Big Pharma. As government officials and healthcare organizations increase the pressure for one-size-fits-all care, many parents are choosing alternative methods to oversee the health and developmental care of their children.
The role of the pediatricians within the current American collective medical model has transitioned, in many instances, to vaccine distributors. It was on their watch over the last two decades that chronic childhood conditions and disorders have spread to epidemic levels. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has toed the line for Big Pharma at every turn, keeping silent while valid and unresolved questions about vaccination continue to root into mainstream consciousness.
For example, throughout the last year multiple whistleblowers have come forward, loudly recoiling against giving all newborns the Hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine, when only an estimated 0.025% of newborns are at risk. The CDC’s own data show that as of 2015, the number of perinatal Hep B infections in the United States was as low as 37. Meanwhile, numerous studies have pointed to major issues with vaccinating newborns, especially premature infants, with the Hep B vaccine. Whistleblowers have corroborated such studies by telling of the alarmingly inhumane culture that has permeated hospital NICUs with respect to dealing with the aftermath of the Hep B vaccine damage in preemies. Yet, the AAP is heeding none of this information and has recently called for administering the Hep B vaccine to all newborns within 24 hours of birth. At $23 a shot, that’s $100,000,000 a year for the private sector pharmaceutical companies.
Another shining example of what a model pediatrician should be, according to mainstream media, academia, and California’s government employees, is Sacramento Senator Dr. Richard Pan. Pan is responsible for introducing Senate Bill 277, forcing vaccines on Californian children as a prerequisite for public and private school attendance. Pan’s public comments, lauded by the AAP, border on dangerously ignorant. Pan has stated on record that water is the most dangerous substance in vaccines, vaccines are not made in aborted fetal cells, there have been no deaths attributed to the measles vaccine, and the recommended vaccine schedule has been shown to be safe and effective. A one-minute look at vaccine inserts, available data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and settlements from US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), and some common sense is enough to prove Pan wrong.
An uncomfortable fact is that a major source of income for pediatricians comes from Well-Baby visits. At those visits pediatricians are expected to perform, among other things, routine vaccination according to the ever-growing, untested CDC-recommedned schedule in order to be reimbursed to the full extent by an insurance plan. According to Blue Care Network, a medical provider could receive up to $225 per service achieved in the category of “childhood immunization — combo 2.”
But pediatricians don’t deserve all the blame. They are working within a system, lorded over by insurance companies that actively seek to penalize them for any deviation from regular vaccine distribution. The CDC’s untested vaccine schedule is considered the standard of care. If a pediatrician doesn't vaccinate according to that standard of care, insurance companies financially penalize the doctor, or even his or her whole medical group by reimbursing at a lower rate. For those working in medical groups or affiliated with hospitals, it could even be considered dereliction of duty, at which point there exists a chance of being fired or losing one's hospital privileges.
So why are parents being told to bring their baby to a pediatrician for well-baby visits during the first year? This was the question posed to a pro-vaccine immunologist speaking at a naturopathic conference in Portland, Oregon. Here is the transcript of the exchange that followed:
Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.
A. True.
Q. So what’s the rationale for continuing to do that if it’s not doing what it’s supposed to be [doing]?
A. The vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it’s only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don’t come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it’s actually more of a training thing.
It’s interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, ‘Oh, you’re talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don’t work.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, I know.’ [laughter].
More and more parents report being 'fired' by their mainstream pediatrician for refusing to vaccinate on the schedule. Such acts are actually blessings in disguise, allowing parents to find a more conscious doctor, who places the ethics of informed consent above lost income for his or her medical practice. Fortunately, there also exist many alternatives other than mainstream pediatrics. Integrative, naturopathic, and chiropractic pediatric practices, that do not believe in one-size-fits-all solutions, are just a few types that have surged in popularity in the current atmosphere of increasingly forced mainstream medicine.
Greater numbers of patients are exiting mainstream healthcare due to its inability to admit and address the root causes of chronic illness combined with its callous and ignorant stance on vaccination. As more and more people understand there are better ways to approach health and healing, slow to act mainstream medicine will have to either bend with the times or risk becoming abandoned in the face of a higher consciousness.
The role of the pediatricians within the current American collective medical model has transitioned, in many instances, to vaccine distributors. It was on their watch over the last two decades that chronic childhood conditions and disorders have spread to epidemic levels. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has toed the line for Big Pharma at every turn, keeping silent while valid and unresolved questions about vaccination continue to root into mainstream consciousness.
For example, throughout the last year multiple whistleblowers have come forward, loudly recoiling against giving all newborns the Hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine, when only an estimated 0.025% of newborns are at risk. The CDC’s own data show that as of 2015, the number of perinatal Hep B infections in the United States was as low as 37. Meanwhile, numerous studies have pointed to major issues with vaccinating newborns, especially premature infants, with the Hep B vaccine. Whistleblowers have corroborated such studies by telling of the alarmingly inhumane culture that has permeated hospital NICUs with respect to dealing with the aftermath of the Hep B vaccine damage in preemies. Yet, the AAP is heeding none of this information and has recently called for administering the Hep B vaccine to all newborns within 24 hours of birth. At $23 a shot, that’s $100,000,000 a year for the private sector pharmaceutical companies.
Another shining example of what a model pediatrician should be, according to mainstream media, academia, and California’s government employees, is Sacramento Senator Dr. Richard Pan. Pan is responsible for introducing Senate Bill 277, forcing vaccines on Californian children as a prerequisite for public and private school attendance. Pan’s public comments, lauded by the AAP, border on dangerously ignorant. Pan has stated on record that water is the most dangerous substance in vaccines, vaccines are not made in aborted fetal cells, there have been no deaths attributed to the measles vaccine, and the recommended vaccine schedule has been shown to be safe and effective. A one-minute look at vaccine inserts, available data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and settlements from US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), and some common sense is enough to prove Pan wrong.
An uncomfortable fact is that a major source of income for pediatricians comes from Well-Baby visits. At those visits pediatricians are expected to perform, among other things, routine vaccination according to the ever-growing, untested CDC-recommedned schedule in order to be reimbursed to the full extent by an insurance plan. According to Blue Care Network, a medical provider could receive up to $225 per service achieved in the category of “childhood immunization — combo 2.”
But pediatricians don’t deserve all the blame. They are working within a system, lorded over by insurance companies that actively seek to penalize them for any deviation from regular vaccine distribution. The CDC’s untested vaccine schedule is considered the standard of care. If a pediatrician doesn't vaccinate according to that standard of care, insurance companies financially penalize the doctor, or even his or her whole medical group by reimbursing at a lower rate. For those working in medical groups or affiliated with hospitals, it could even be considered dereliction of duty, at which point there exists a chance of being fired or losing one's hospital privileges.
So why are parents being told to bring their baby to a pediatrician for well-baby visits during the first year? This was the question posed to a pro-vaccine immunologist speaking at a naturopathic conference in Portland, Oregon. Here is the transcript of the exchange that followed:
Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.
A. True.
Q. So what’s the rationale for continuing to do that if it’s not doing what it’s supposed to be [doing]?
A. The vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it’s only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don’t come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it’s actually more of a training thing.
It’s interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, ‘Oh, you’re talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don’t work.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, I know.’ [laughter].
More and more parents report being 'fired' by their mainstream pediatrician for refusing to vaccinate on the schedule. Such acts are actually blessings in disguise, allowing parents to find a more conscious doctor, who places the ethics of informed consent above lost income for his or her medical practice. Fortunately, there also exist many alternatives other than mainstream pediatrics. Integrative, naturopathic, and chiropractic pediatric practices, that do not believe in one-size-fits-all solutions, are just a few types that have surged in popularity in the current atmosphere of increasingly forced mainstream medicine.
Greater numbers of patients are exiting mainstream healthcare due to its inability to admit and address the root causes of chronic illness combined with its callous and ignorant stance on vaccination. As more and more people understand there are better ways to approach health and healing, slow to act mainstream medicine will have to either bend with the times or risk becoming abandoned in the face of a higher consciousness.
RSS Feed