By Jefferey
Jaxen
The delicately balanced cathedral, upon which vaccine policy is based is being tested. The integrity of its theoretical pillars is being challenged by real life—and they are failing. The public is becoming painfully aware that what mainstream medicine and corporate media sold us was all lies based upon illusion, opinions, fraud, misplaced faith, and assumptions. To put it bluntly, we have all been lied to about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
In the past, corporate media and medical officials who knew the lies have closely guarded them. The science to back up the claims of vaccine safety and effectiveness is simply not there, and now medicine and media are starting to admit this fact. Within the span of only two short weeks, several research articles have been published, revealing the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines. The real story here isn’t that research has been done but that these truths, still somewhat watered down, have been allowed to penetrate mainstream consciousness by corporate media gatekeepers and the medical cartel.
It was on September 13 that the Washington Post ran the headline “Researchers find hint of a link between flu vaccine and miscarriage.” It took less than a day for the educated public to point out that the “hint of a link” was actually over a seven-fold increase. After receiving massive waves of social media mocking, the Washington Post was forcedto change their original headline to a more authoritative one, “What to know about a study of flu shots and miscarriages,” in which the media outlet still lied to its readers by omitting the dangers and ineffectiveness of the flu shot.
The flu shot continued to take a beating from ScienceMag.org in a piece titled “Why flu vaccines so often fail.” The article states “flu shots protect no more than 60% of people who receive them; some years, effectiveness plunges to as low as 10%.” Right from the start this statement is inaccurate. During the 2015-2016 Canadian flu season, their health officials publicly admitted that the flu shot offered “no protection.” The ScienceMag.org piece goes on to quote epidemiologist Michael Osterholm who calls the flu shot “…a terribly inadequate vaccine for a serious health threat.” Osterholm, in what appears to be a moment of clarity, strikes at the heart of the failed flu vaccine paradigm when he states, “It’s much more complicated than I thought. I know less about influenza today than I did 10 years ago.” The flu shot is created by manufacturers months ahead of the flu season by guessing the upcoming strains of flu viruses that may be dominant. Incorrect strain guessing was always given as the excuse in the past by the medical community and public health officials for the flu shot’s rampant failures. Yet according to this new article, researchers are learning instead that the vaccine may falter even when the right strains were used to make it.
On the heels of the flu shot miscarriage admission and ScienceMag’s flu shot fizzle admission, Boston University’s School of Public Health recently released a piece titled “Whooping Cough May Owe to Vaccine’s Inability to Prevent Infections.” Since the scientifically fragile theory of herd immunity claims to rely upon a fully vaccinated population to work, what happens to herd immunity when the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection is a complete failure? Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article states:
“This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,”…Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may have made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”
Does that sound like settled science? Reading between the lines, Gill’s statement is an admission that the public has been part of a failed public health experiment that contained within it major health risks, which many are now paying the price for. Make no mistake, the pertussis vaccine was mandated for children and aggressively marketed to pregnant women and even senior citizens under the guise of protecting the newborns. Will any lawmakers, media outlets, regulatory agency officials, or vaccine manufacturers be held accountable?
Like most chronological stories involving vaccine safety and effectiveness, this recent admission from Boston University only scratches the surface of historic vaccine failures, manipulation, fraud, and damage surrounding vaccines. It was the whole cell pertussis vaccine that was damaging to a large number of children in the 1980s. Due to the damage, lawsuits were piling up against vaccine manufacturers, threatening to bankrupt the industry and kill the lucrative sector for pharmaceutical companies. The 1991 book A Shot in the Dark traces the development of the DPT vaccine, its shortcomings and risks.
So in the past two weeks alone it has been admitted publicly that the flu shot increases the risk of miscarriages in pregnant women, the pertussis vaccine has failed in the control of pertussis, and the entire scientific methodology used to justify their use was, and still is, flawed. Where do we go from here? It was reported one month ago that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has forbidden its employees to speak with the media on everything from “formal interview requests to the most basic of data requests."
It has been clear for some time that most vaccine recommendations by public health agencies and officials have been based on outdated, unrealistic assumptions at best. The mainstream medical community is now in the uncomfortable position of having to admit that crucial errors have been made. Will they unravel the errors or continue to double down and damage control the crumbling narrative? Only time will tell. If the latest move by the CDC is any indication, we have the fight of a lifetime on our hands to dislodge a historically corrupt, adversarial agency and the disoriented mainstream medical community striking at the roots of the health of generations of American families.
In the past, corporate media and medical officials who knew the lies have closely guarded them. The science to back up the claims of vaccine safety and effectiveness is simply not there, and now medicine and media are starting to admit this fact. Within the span of only two short weeks, several research articles have been published, revealing the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines. The real story here isn’t that research has been done but that these truths, still somewhat watered down, have been allowed to penetrate mainstream consciousness by corporate media gatekeepers and the medical cartel.
It was on September 13 that the Washington Post ran the headline “Researchers find hint of a link between flu vaccine and miscarriage.” It took less than a day for the educated public to point out that the “hint of a link” was actually over a seven-fold increase. After receiving massive waves of social media mocking, the Washington Post was forcedto change their original headline to a more authoritative one, “What to know about a study of flu shots and miscarriages,” in which the media outlet still lied to its readers by omitting the dangers and ineffectiveness of the flu shot.
The flu shot continued to take a beating from ScienceMag.org in a piece titled “Why flu vaccines so often fail.” The article states “flu shots protect no more than 60% of people who receive them; some years, effectiveness plunges to as low as 10%.” Right from the start this statement is inaccurate. During the 2015-2016 Canadian flu season, their health officials publicly admitted that the flu shot offered “no protection.” The ScienceMag.org piece goes on to quote epidemiologist Michael Osterholm who calls the flu shot “…a terribly inadequate vaccine for a serious health threat.” Osterholm, in what appears to be a moment of clarity, strikes at the heart of the failed flu vaccine paradigm when he states, “It’s much more complicated than I thought. I know less about influenza today than I did 10 years ago.” The flu shot is created by manufacturers months ahead of the flu season by guessing the upcoming strains of flu viruses that may be dominant. Incorrect strain guessing was always given as the excuse in the past by the medical community and public health officials for the flu shot’s rampant failures. Yet according to this new article, researchers are learning instead that the vaccine may falter even when the right strains were used to make it.
On the heels of the flu shot miscarriage admission and ScienceMag’s flu shot fizzle admission, Boston University’s School of Public Health recently released a piece titled “Whooping Cough May Owe to Vaccine’s Inability to Prevent Infections.” Since the scientifically fragile theory of herd immunity claims to rely upon a fully vaccinated population to work, what happens to herd immunity when the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection is a complete failure? Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article states:
“This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,”…Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may have made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”
Does that sound like settled science? Reading between the lines, Gill’s statement is an admission that the public has been part of a failed public health experiment that contained within it major health risks, which many are now paying the price for. Make no mistake, the pertussis vaccine was mandated for children and aggressively marketed to pregnant women and even senior citizens under the guise of protecting the newborns. Will any lawmakers, media outlets, regulatory agency officials, or vaccine manufacturers be held accountable?
Like most chronological stories involving vaccine safety and effectiveness, this recent admission from Boston University only scratches the surface of historic vaccine failures, manipulation, fraud, and damage surrounding vaccines. It was the whole cell pertussis vaccine that was damaging to a large number of children in the 1980s. Due to the damage, lawsuits were piling up against vaccine manufacturers, threatening to bankrupt the industry and kill the lucrative sector for pharmaceutical companies. The 1991 book A Shot in the Dark traces the development of the DPT vaccine, its shortcomings and risks.
So in the past two weeks alone it has been admitted publicly that the flu shot increases the risk of miscarriages in pregnant women, the pertussis vaccine has failed in the control of pertussis, and the entire scientific methodology used to justify their use was, and still is, flawed. Where do we go from here? It was reported one month ago that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has forbidden its employees to speak with the media on everything from “formal interview requests to the most basic of data requests."
It has been clear for some time that most vaccine recommendations by public health agencies and officials have been based on outdated, unrealistic assumptions at best. The mainstream medical community is now in the uncomfortable position of having to admit that crucial errors have been made. Will they unravel the errors or continue to double down and damage control the crumbling narrative? Only time will tell. If the latest move by the CDC is any indication, we have the fight of a lifetime on our hands to dislodge a historically corrupt, adversarial agency and the disoriented mainstream medical community striking at the roots of the health of generations of American families.
RSS Feed