In 1997, the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) undertook an initiative on immunization registries made up of the NVAC members and others. Soon after each state within the United States implemented an Immunization Information System (IIS). In other words, a vaccine tracking system. Since the inception of state-run IIS’s, the political rehoretic and passage of laws has steadily gained speed on the way towards the removal of medical consent. At least 12 states have vaccine-related legislation on the docket to heavily damage or completely remove medical consent. Universal enforcement of potential vaccine-related legislation laws are currently a grey area. However, a behind the curtain view of potential enforcement options the U.S. public has already received appears to remove informed consent and medical choice.
The stated goal of the IIS, overseen by the Center’s for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when handling the U.S. Citizens is as follows:
“At the population level, an IIS provides aggregate data on vaccinations for use in surveillance and program operations, and in guiding public health action with the goals of improving vaccination rates…”
It is every parent’s right, stated directly by the IIS under the system’s Privacy and Confidentiality section, to exercise parental consent with regards to their child’s involvement in the system. The IIS states the following:
Notification - Parents must be notified of the existence of the IIS, what information will be contained in it, and how the information will be used.
Choice - Parents must be allowed to choose whether to participate in the IIS.
Use of IIS information - IIS information must only be used for its intended purpose and not be used in a punitive manner.
According to its website, the IIS system is required to collect the patients full name, birthdate, sex, race ethnicity, birth order, state, country, mother’s full name, vaccine type, vaccine manufacturer, vaccination date, and lot number.
To be fair, this system is utilized to report vaccine injury and is used in conjunction with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) which has paid out over $3 billion in damages to date. It is important to know that in 2014, a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office looking at the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the U.S. stated:
“11 percent of claims filed since fiscal year 1999 were still in process (pending) as of March 31, 2014…”
“In some instances, however, a vaccine can have severe side effects, including death or an injury requiring lifetime medical care.”
The U.S. public, especially those with school-age children, are facing difficult decisions. The mainstream media has proven to be no help remaining historically silent on these issues. Major news institutions only cover and spin stories that suit a once-sided agenda in favor of the large drug houses who manufacturer vaccinations. This was explained clearly by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a recent interview:
“I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election years, 70 percent of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads…He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account.”
California, the first state to take the plunge by passing Senate Bill 277, has removed medical choice for school children. SB277 is directly at odds with California’s Compulsory Education Laws which denies a tax-payer funded public school education for unvaccinated children. SB277 unfairly targets the poor and low income families. Such families choosing not to vaccinate their children often do not have the option of a costly private education. Therefore, SB277 does not work equally upon all classes of people and is by definition discriminatory.
Recently, the Orange Country Department of Education’s Legal Division is the first California school to go on record by giving their interpretation of how to handle vaccine non-compliers once SB277 takes effect on July 1st, 2016. Their suggestions are for education boards to seek court orders to vaccinate or to follow the orders already taught to educators under the California Educators Training Module and call Child Protective Services.
The stated goal of the IIS, overseen by the Center’s for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when handling the U.S. Citizens is as follows:
“At the population level, an IIS provides aggregate data on vaccinations for use in surveillance and program operations, and in guiding public health action with the goals of improving vaccination rates…”
It is every parent’s right, stated directly by the IIS under the system’s Privacy and Confidentiality section, to exercise parental consent with regards to their child’s involvement in the system. The IIS states the following:
Notification - Parents must be notified of the existence of the IIS, what information will be contained in it, and how the information will be used.
Choice - Parents must be allowed to choose whether to participate in the IIS.
Use of IIS information - IIS information must only be used for its intended purpose and not be used in a punitive manner.
According to its website, the IIS system is required to collect the patients full name, birthdate, sex, race ethnicity, birth order, state, country, mother’s full name, vaccine type, vaccine manufacturer, vaccination date, and lot number.
To be fair, this system is utilized to report vaccine injury and is used in conjunction with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) which has paid out over $3 billion in damages to date. It is important to know that in 2014, a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office looking at the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the U.S. stated:
“11 percent of claims filed since fiscal year 1999 were still in process (pending) as of March 31, 2014…”
“In some instances, however, a vaccine can have severe side effects, including death or an injury requiring lifetime medical care.”
The U.S. public, especially those with school-age children, are facing difficult decisions. The mainstream media has proven to be no help remaining historically silent on these issues. Major news institutions only cover and spin stories that suit a once-sided agenda in favor of the large drug houses who manufacturer vaccinations. This was explained clearly by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a recent interview:
“I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election years, 70 percent of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads…He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account.”
California, the first state to take the plunge by passing Senate Bill 277, has removed medical choice for school children. SB277 is directly at odds with California’s Compulsory Education Laws which denies a tax-payer funded public school education for unvaccinated children. SB277 unfairly targets the poor and low income families. Such families choosing not to vaccinate their children often do not have the option of a costly private education. Therefore, SB277 does not work equally upon all classes of people and is by definition discriminatory.
Recently, the Orange Country Department of Education’s Legal Division is the first California school to go on record by giving their interpretation of how to handle vaccine non-compliers once SB277 takes effect on July 1st, 2016. Their suggestions are for education boards to seek court orders to vaccinate or to follow the orders already taught to educators under the California Educators Training Module and call Child Protective Services.
Parents in Indiana and New York, who were unaware that their children had been entered into a vaccine tracking system, are already getting letters strongly suggesting the 3-series Human Papilloma Virus shot.
|
|
Given the information already known, it is no stretch of the imagination to see where this push for ever increasing vaccination schedules will lead in the United States. The laws are being put on the books to justify the removal of medical consent while doctors, nurses, and teachers are simultaneously being trained to carry out the orders. The federal government has publicly stated, in extreme detail, its plans over the next five years in the Healthy People 2020 initiative. In short, every category of vaccination is to reach at least 80 percent in every vaccination category. What happens when 80% pushes back in favor of medical freedom and informed consent? Perhaps this is the real question. How far are doctors, nurses, and school boards willing to participate as the action arms of pharmaceutical companies with decades of colorful criminal records? The Nuremberg Trials between 1945 to 1949 stand as a testament to show what happens when real justice is served. It is the ones who carried out the orders that receive the punishment, not the powers that set the orders in motion.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE IIS CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR STATE.
It is important to consider that phone calls and phone conversations typically do not hold up in court. Therefore, it is important that parents considering the removal of their child from the IIS system request so in letter format using plain, direct language. Included in the letter should be the request for a return response confirming the child’s IIS removal. In addition, letters sent should be accompanied by signature confirmation receipt and delivery confirmation for further paper trail accountability.
Disclaimer:
The materials available at this web site and opinions contained within this article are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Jefferey Jaxen and the user or browser. The opinions
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE IIS CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR STATE.
It is important to consider that phone calls and phone conversations typically do not hold up in court. Therefore, it is important that parents considering the removal of their child from the IIS system request so in letter format using plain, direct language. Included in the letter should be the request for a return response confirming the child’s IIS removal. In addition, letters sent should be accompanied by signature confirmation receipt and delivery confirmation for further paper trail accountability.
Disclaimer:
The materials available at this web site and opinions contained within this article are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Jefferey Jaxen and the user or browser. The opinions
|
|
|
RSS Feed