Regulatory agencies throughout the world have been bestowed with the task of protecting us from an ever-increasing toxic environment. Whose best interest are they really looking out for? If a message or assurance is flashed next to an official governmental agency logo, most will snap to attention with no questions asked. Yet a growing number of people at all levels of society are now seeing the disconnection, the obfuscation, and the inconvenient angles such agencies go to great lengths to overlook.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are not only failing in their duties, but are doing their best to ignore and keep hidden from the public vital incidences and facts.
Glyphosate, Monsanto’s widely-used herbicide product shown continuously to cause various cancers, has been allowed to thrive in an unregulated, open market for decades by the FDA. Gilles-Éric Séralini has recently published a new paper titled Toxicity of formulants and heavy metals in glyphosate-based herbicides and other pesticides. The study reveals damning findings of the true human and plant toxicity from Glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) formulations and pesticide formulations. It should be noted that during all regulatory investigations and rulings, past and present, the safety levels and licensure of glyphosate and other declared active ingredients in pesticides has been based upon cherry-picked, and often industry funded/supported studies. All of the studies have looked at glyphosate in isolation and not combined with its formulants, as it is being used in the real world. Put simply, real-life exposures of pesticides and herbicides have never been studied and Séralini’s study, the first to look at such exposures, is nothing short of alarming. Internal Monsanto emails show the company has not studied its glyphosate Roundup formulations with statements as follows:
“…you cannot say that Roundup is not a carcinogen ... we have not done the necessary testing on the formulation to make that statement.” -Monsanto’s Head Toxicologist Donna Farmer, PhD
“We do not conduct sub-chronic, chronic or terotogenicity studies with our formulations.” -Regulatory Affairs Lead at Monsanto Europe, Xavier Belvaux
The crimes, scandals, fines and purposeful harm done by large pharmaceutical companies is legendary. The FDA and CDC have been alongside these questionable corporate entities during the whole journey. Through continuous, revolving door management positions between US government regulatory agencies and lucrative drug company positions, regulatory bodies have not only looked the other way, but actively jockeyed to keep monopolized control over an industrial medical complex.
It was in the 1980’s that the multinational drug house Bayer, known for its admitted collaboration with the Nazi’s during WWII, sold HIV-contaminated blood products to hemophiliacs in full knowledge of its actions. Thousands of the recipients later died of AIDS. Bayer eventually paid tens of millions of dollars to end the three-decade long scandal/crime. No FDA warning. No CDC oversight. No prison time for those responsible.
In December 2016, The Morning Call reported that glass was found in Sanofi’s vaccines. Both Sanofi and the FDA did little to nothing in response reports The Morning Call:
“Sanofi, on the other hand, allowed doctors and nurses throughout the country to continue injecting babies with the potentially problematic ActHIB for another year and a half. The FDA did not push back, either. After the regulatory agency found out about the issue, it accepted the company's assurances that the vaccine was safe.”
No safety testing to determine if injecting glass into humans is dangerous, no common sense shown, no erring on the side of caution…nothing. The public gets to bear the brunt of whatever injury and death spirals from the purposeful endangerment and complete lack of regulatory oversight. It wasn’t until 2017 when President Trump unveiled a sweeping new $500 million dollar effort between Merck, Pfizer and Corning Inc. to manufacture a new kind of glass for injectable drug vials. What was wrong with the old glass? How long has the vaccine glass shedding issue been going on?
A 2017 paper in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination entitled "New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination,” revealing the presence of “micro-, submicro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies” was removed shortly after it was published. Pushback from social media and the medical community forced the journal to reinstate the study shortly after its removal. The study found all human vaccines tested contained contamination that was not declared by the vaccine manufacturers. After the study was published in February 2017, no vaccine manufacturer commented publicly on the findings. The FDA was silent and has continued to be so to this day.
On September 2016, the national grassroots coalition Moms Across America (MAA) issued a press release detailing the findings of glyphosate contamination in five vaccines tested by Microbe Inotech Laboratories, Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri. Second, a 2016 study conducted by Italian researchers found all 43 human vaccines tested were contaminated with heavy metal nanoparticles. MAA sent a letter on September 1, 2016 to the FDA, CDC, EPA, NIH, California Department of Health, and Senator Boxer requesting that they make it a priority to test vaccines for glyphosate, recall contaminated vaccines and for the EPA to revoke the license of glyphosate to prevent further contamination. “And in the meantime we call upon our lawmakers to rescind the mandate which forces parents to vaccinate their child in order to attend school, in light of extraordinary new evidence.” After receiving no reply, MAA filed a FOIA request to the FDA. MMA reported:
“…we informed the FDA we found glyphosate in vaccines and asked the FDA and CDC to test for glyphosate in vaccines. They did not address that request in their response. Then I filed a FOI to request any and all information they had on glyphosate in vaccines. I wanted to know if they tested ( and just didn't tell us), or who decided not to test, and what information they had on glyphosate in vaccines. Their response is infuriating, unjust and some might argue, potentially criminal. Over 50% of the pages from the FDA were redacted. Many completely blank.”
It was Stephanie Cave, M.D. who testified before the Committee on Government Reform in the US House of Representatives in 2000 regarding ethyl mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines and the rise in neurological disorders and autism. Dr. Cave simply did the math and found that the CDC’s vaccination schedule, containing untested injected boluses of ethyl mercury, far exceeded the EPA limit for ingested mercury. Soon after the US government instructed vaccine manufacturers to quietly remove the thimerosal from vaccines. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explained in a recent interview what happened next:
“They [the drug companies] didn’t issue a product recall. What they did was the ones you have on the shelve, just use em’ up, and the new ones, just don’t make them with mercury. And so we had about a three year period of time from 2001 to 2004 that they were just going off the shelf by attrition, not because this was an urgency and we needed to get rid of the stuff and get it off the shelf.”
Where do we go from here? During an ongoing, US opioid epidemic of historic proportions, the FDA diverted its focus to officially propose a new, risk-based enforcement approach to homeopathic drug products on December 18. In a head-scratching move, the agency intends to prioritize enforcement and regulatory actions involving certain categories of homeopathic products, with long-proven safety, that "potentially pose a higher risk to public health" according to the FDA.
By their actions, it strongly appears that the FDA and CDC are nothing more than gatekeeper enforcers to an industrial medical complex whose top priorities are money and power, not health and healing. Through ground-up education and personal empowerment of ourselves and our families, our daily health choices can act to minimize our interaction with a broken medical system and its often authoritarian regulatory bodies. By applying continuous pressure on our elected officials and holding them accountable at every level, progress can be made to remove the authoritarian nature of our US regulatory agencies currently acting as barriers to health and healing.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are not only failing in their duties, but are doing their best to ignore and keep hidden from the public vital incidences and facts.
Glyphosate, Monsanto’s widely-used herbicide product shown continuously to cause various cancers, has been allowed to thrive in an unregulated, open market for decades by the FDA. Gilles-Éric Séralini has recently published a new paper titled Toxicity of formulants and heavy metals in glyphosate-based herbicides and other pesticides. The study reveals damning findings of the true human and plant toxicity from Glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) formulations and pesticide formulations. It should be noted that during all regulatory investigations and rulings, past and present, the safety levels and licensure of glyphosate and other declared active ingredients in pesticides has been based upon cherry-picked, and often industry funded/supported studies. All of the studies have looked at glyphosate in isolation and not combined with its formulants, as it is being used in the real world. Put simply, real-life exposures of pesticides and herbicides have never been studied and Séralini’s study, the first to look at such exposures, is nothing short of alarming. Internal Monsanto emails show the company has not studied its glyphosate Roundup formulations with statements as follows:
“…you cannot say that Roundup is not a carcinogen ... we have not done the necessary testing on the formulation to make that statement.” -Monsanto’s Head Toxicologist Donna Farmer, PhD
“We do not conduct sub-chronic, chronic or terotogenicity studies with our formulations.” -Regulatory Affairs Lead at Monsanto Europe, Xavier Belvaux
The crimes, scandals, fines and purposeful harm done by large pharmaceutical companies is legendary. The FDA and CDC have been alongside these questionable corporate entities during the whole journey. Through continuous, revolving door management positions between US government regulatory agencies and lucrative drug company positions, regulatory bodies have not only looked the other way, but actively jockeyed to keep monopolized control over an industrial medical complex.
It was in the 1980’s that the multinational drug house Bayer, known for its admitted collaboration with the Nazi’s during WWII, sold HIV-contaminated blood products to hemophiliacs in full knowledge of its actions. Thousands of the recipients later died of AIDS. Bayer eventually paid tens of millions of dollars to end the three-decade long scandal/crime. No FDA warning. No CDC oversight. No prison time for those responsible.
In December 2016, The Morning Call reported that glass was found in Sanofi’s vaccines. Both Sanofi and the FDA did little to nothing in response reports The Morning Call:
“Sanofi, on the other hand, allowed doctors and nurses throughout the country to continue injecting babies with the potentially problematic ActHIB for another year and a half. The FDA did not push back, either. After the regulatory agency found out about the issue, it accepted the company's assurances that the vaccine was safe.”
No safety testing to determine if injecting glass into humans is dangerous, no common sense shown, no erring on the side of caution…nothing. The public gets to bear the brunt of whatever injury and death spirals from the purposeful endangerment and complete lack of regulatory oversight. It wasn’t until 2017 when President Trump unveiled a sweeping new $500 million dollar effort between Merck, Pfizer and Corning Inc. to manufacture a new kind of glass for injectable drug vials. What was wrong with the old glass? How long has the vaccine glass shedding issue been going on?
A 2017 paper in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination entitled "New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination,” revealing the presence of “micro-, submicro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies” was removed shortly after it was published. Pushback from social media and the medical community forced the journal to reinstate the study shortly after its removal. The study found all human vaccines tested contained contamination that was not declared by the vaccine manufacturers. After the study was published in February 2017, no vaccine manufacturer commented publicly on the findings. The FDA was silent and has continued to be so to this day.
On September 2016, the national grassroots coalition Moms Across America (MAA) issued a press release detailing the findings of glyphosate contamination in five vaccines tested by Microbe Inotech Laboratories, Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri. Second, a 2016 study conducted by Italian researchers found all 43 human vaccines tested were contaminated with heavy metal nanoparticles. MAA sent a letter on September 1, 2016 to the FDA, CDC, EPA, NIH, California Department of Health, and Senator Boxer requesting that they make it a priority to test vaccines for glyphosate, recall contaminated vaccines and for the EPA to revoke the license of glyphosate to prevent further contamination. “And in the meantime we call upon our lawmakers to rescind the mandate which forces parents to vaccinate their child in order to attend school, in light of extraordinary new evidence.” After receiving no reply, MAA filed a FOIA request to the FDA. MMA reported:
“…we informed the FDA we found glyphosate in vaccines and asked the FDA and CDC to test for glyphosate in vaccines. They did not address that request in their response. Then I filed a FOI to request any and all information they had on glyphosate in vaccines. I wanted to know if they tested ( and just didn't tell us), or who decided not to test, and what information they had on glyphosate in vaccines. Their response is infuriating, unjust and some might argue, potentially criminal. Over 50% of the pages from the FDA were redacted. Many completely blank.”
It was Stephanie Cave, M.D. who testified before the Committee on Government Reform in the US House of Representatives in 2000 regarding ethyl mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines and the rise in neurological disorders and autism. Dr. Cave simply did the math and found that the CDC’s vaccination schedule, containing untested injected boluses of ethyl mercury, far exceeded the EPA limit for ingested mercury. Soon after the US government instructed vaccine manufacturers to quietly remove the thimerosal from vaccines. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explained in a recent interview what happened next:
“They [the drug companies] didn’t issue a product recall. What they did was the ones you have on the shelve, just use em’ up, and the new ones, just don’t make them with mercury. And so we had about a three year period of time from 2001 to 2004 that they were just going off the shelf by attrition, not because this was an urgency and we needed to get rid of the stuff and get it off the shelf.”
Where do we go from here? During an ongoing, US opioid epidemic of historic proportions, the FDA diverted its focus to officially propose a new, risk-based enforcement approach to homeopathic drug products on December 18. In a head-scratching move, the agency intends to prioritize enforcement and regulatory actions involving certain categories of homeopathic products, with long-proven safety, that "potentially pose a higher risk to public health" according to the FDA.
By their actions, it strongly appears that the FDA and CDC are nothing more than gatekeeper enforcers to an industrial medical complex whose top priorities are money and power, not health and healing. Through ground-up education and personal empowerment of ourselves and our families, our daily health choices can act to minimize our interaction with a broken medical system and its often authoritarian regulatory bodies. By applying continuous pressure on our elected officials and holding them accountable at every level, progress can be made to remove the authoritarian nature of our US regulatory agencies currently acting as barriers to health and healing.
RSS Feed