In a system where official rhetoric rarely has to explain inconvenient reality, calming the public’s fears around the safety of genetically modified organisms (GMO) and their associated chemicals have been a multi-decade, full-time job. Public relation blitzes spotlighting one-sided stories, reports and industry-funded studies attempt to frame the conversation around the safety of GMO’s. Their associated chemicals — many listed as carcinogens of various severity — are marketed as world-saving technology while the mainstream media strains to force these uncomfortable ideas down the public’s throat.
With a successful 2016 global March Against Monsanto recently, there appears to be no shortage of push back from humanity against GMO’s. Thinking parents and mobilized communities continue to vote with their purchases against a genetically modified takeover of our food supply. Another major foundation blocking the genetically modified encroachment on the planet’s food supply is the few voices representing courageous scientific research. It is no secret that corporate-funded studies on GMO food and their associated chemicals get the lion’s share of publicity and publication in medical journals. Within this tightly controlled realm of research, few are bold enough to venture far from the shore of corporate-funded studies fearing for their reputation and job security. Enter MIT Senior Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff, PhD. A brilliant mind able to distill complex medical issues and pathologies plaguing humanity, Seneff has worked to deconstruct glyphosate — Monsanto’s failed flagship product — for the scourge of humanity it has become.
On May 17 the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) issued it's abusively insulting conclusion of a lengthy study titled “Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects.” The NAS study found “no evidence of harm to human health or the environment”. After the laughter died down at NAS’s conclusions, Seneff went to work presenting on the opening day of AutismOne. The auditorium — filled to capacity — was treated to a glimpse of another version of science from a decorated PhD researcher from a prestigious institution on her way to retirement [read: not concerned about blowback to her career for speaking out]. Her talk was titled ‘Glyphosate Pretending to be Glycine: Devastating Consequences’. Eagerly on hand was a French film crew documenting Seneff's talk.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the herbicide Round Up. Its toxicity is insidious, and according to Seneff, it generational damage comes about mainly because glyphosate is a synthetic amino acid. Amino acids — the building blocks of proteins — appear to be an Achilles heal once glyphosate enters the body. In a protein (the workhorses of the body), the amino acid GLYcine is being replaced by GLYphosate, a synthetic amino acid. The inferior and counterfeit Glyphosate replacement then wreaks havoc on human physiology in multiple ways, leading to a nearly complete explanation for the strong correlations between the rise in glyphosate usage on crops and the increased incidence in a host of chronic modern diseases, including diabetes, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, adrenal insufficiency, anemia, spina bifida and autism.
Seneff was the first to go on record publicly and state that by by 2025, 1 in 2 children will be on the autism spectrum. A finding supported not only by the epidemic statistical rise of the disorder since the early 1980's, but also coinciding with the rise of GMO's and agrochemicals like glyphosate and others.
Seneff floated a theory that, if found true, could (further) devastate a vaccine industry already on its last legs of integrity. The idea that glyphosate is an ingredient in vaccines is a plausible one claims Seneff. The live viruses created for vaccines are grown on gelatin from ligaments derived from cows fed high amounts of GMO Roundup Ready corn and soy. The gelatin comes from collagen, and one of collagen's major building blocks is glycine [glyphosate]. Seneff's vaccine theory is currently being worked on thoroughly and could mean financial ruin for pharmaceutical companies that are shifting the bulk of their business model to liability-free, legally mandated immunization campaigns worldwide.
With a successful 2016 global March Against Monsanto recently, there appears to be no shortage of push back from humanity against GMO’s. Thinking parents and mobilized communities continue to vote with their purchases against a genetically modified takeover of our food supply. Another major foundation blocking the genetically modified encroachment on the planet’s food supply is the few voices representing courageous scientific research. It is no secret that corporate-funded studies on GMO food and their associated chemicals get the lion’s share of publicity and publication in medical journals. Within this tightly controlled realm of research, few are bold enough to venture far from the shore of corporate-funded studies fearing for their reputation and job security. Enter MIT Senior Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff, PhD. A brilliant mind able to distill complex medical issues and pathologies plaguing humanity, Seneff has worked to deconstruct glyphosate — Monsanto’s failed flagship product — for the scourge of humanity it has become.
On May 17 the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) issued it's abusively insulting conclusion of a lengthy study titled “Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects.” The NAS study found “no evidence of harm to human health or the environment”. After the laughter died down at NAS’s conclusions, Seneff went to work presenting on the opening day of AutismOne. The auditorium — filled to capacity — was treated to a glimpse of another version of science from a decorated PhD researcher from a prestigious institution on her way to retirement [read: not concerned about blowback to her career for speaking out]. Her talk was titled ‘Glyphosate Pretending to be Glycine: Devastating Consequences’. Eagerly on hand was a French film crew documenting Seneff's talk.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the herbicide Round Up. Its toxicity is insidious, and according to Seneff, it generational damage comes about mainly because glyphosate is a synthetic amino acid. Amino acids — the building blocks of proteins — appear to be an Achilles heal once glyphosate enters the body. In a protein (the workhorses of the body), the amino acid GLYcine is being replaced by GLYphosate, a synthetic amino acid. The inferior and counterfeit Glyphosate replacement then wreaks havoc on human physiology in multiple ways, leading to a nearly complete explanation for the strong correlations between the rise in glyphosate usage on crops and the increased incidence in a host of chronic modern diseases, including diabetes, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, adrenal insufficiency, anemia, spina bifida and autism.
Seneff was the first to go on record publicly and state that by by 2025, 1 in 2 children will be on the autism spectrum. A finding supported not only by the epidemic statistical rise of the disorder since the early 1980's, but also coinciding with the rise of GMO's and agrochemicals like glyphosate and others.
Seneff floated a theory that, if found true, could (further) devastate a vaccine industry already on its last legs of integrity. The idea that glyphosate is an ingredient in vaccines is a plausible one claims Seneff. The live viruses created for vaccines are grown on gelatin from ligaments derived from cows fed high amounts of GMO Roundup Ready corn and soy. The gelatin comes from collagen, and one of collagen's major building blocks is glycine [glyphosate]. Seneff's vaccine theory is currently being worked on thoroughly and could mean financial ruin for pharmaceutical companies that are shifting the bulk of their business model to liability-free, legally mandated immunization campaigns worldwide.